Network Security

Cutting edge and comprehensive Network & Data Security Solutions.

Supplying the very best in class hardware solutions

The Generation 8 Servers from Hewlett Packard

When speed and latency really matter

GEN has the options for you

Unified Communications

Brings your computer, tablet and phone closer together

State of the Art Green DataCentres

Using the latest technology and Power Management

In its landmark Alice v. CLS Bankdecision, the Supreme Court returned some much-needed balance to the patent system. The court invalidated an abstract software patent, essentially ruling that adding on a

computer to an abstract idea does not make it patentable. The Alice ruling has been particularly important because courts have often applied it early in litigation. This has allowed even small companies to fight back against patent trolls wielding weak software patents. Weve featured many of these stories in our Saved By Alice series.

A pair of recent decisions from the Federal Circuit threaten to undermine Alice. In these rulings Berkheimer v. HP [PDF] and Aatrix Software v. Green Shades Software [PDF] the court suggests that the decision under Alice, about what makes an invention patent eligible, is a heavily factual inquiry. If these rulings stand, district courts may become much less likely to apply Alice early in litigation. Defendants would be required to go through expensive discovery, or even a full jury trial, to get a ruling on patent eligibility. Once again, trolls with software patents would be able to use the ruinous cost of defending a patent suit to force settlements, even when their patents are invalid.

EFF, together with the R Street Institute, has filed an amicus brief [PDF] urging the Federal Circuit to rehear the Berkheimer appeal en banc. This means that all the active judges of the appeals court would review the decision. We argue that the panels decision is both wrong on the law and bad policy. The panels decision disregards long-standing Supreme Court and Federal Circuit law that makes it the judges role to construe patents. On policy, we describe how early Alice rulings have helped end many of the most abusive patent trolling campaigns.

When the Alice case was originally before the Federal Circuit, one judge argued that a ruling finding the patent invalid would would decimate the electronics and software industries. This dire prediction turned out to be completely wrong. In fact, R&D spending on software began increasing at an even faster rate after the Supreme Courts 2014 decision. Where Alice did not hurt the software industry, the Berkheimer and Aatrix rulings could hurt the industry by making software companies more vulnerable to the abstract patents that Alice invalidated.

We hope the Federal Circuit rehears Berkheimer and confirms that patent eligibility under Alice is a legal question that can be settled early.

Like most documents to come out of the EU, the full document is vast and unwieldy so here's a summary of the key points. In the coming months there will no doubt be an ever increased gaggle of companies promising to make you compliant for s

...

At GEN we have a proactive approach to network and service security and run continuous scans and penetration tests on our in-house and customers services. We use machine level scanning technology from Beyond Trust together with application

...

The public cant judge if courts are fair if the public is locked out. The parties generally dont care if the proceedings are hidden (indeed, they may want them hidden). This

As a Draytek Partner,  we supply the full range of Draytek Vigor routers, switches and IPPBX's. We further offer support services for those routers, and via our ISP we can provider xDSL services. Using the more advanced features provided by

...